Skip to main content

Gallantly Streaming: Linkin Park Stops Pretending

A week ahead of its official release, Linkin Park is streaming their fifth album Living Things via iTunes

Upon first listen, the one thing that becomes immediately clear is the album's streamlined approach; its 12 tracks clock in at a paltry 37 minutes.  Lead single Burn It Down, at a shade under four minutes, is the closest you're going to get to a magnum opus on this platter.

As the album plays on, it also becomes apparent that the blatant pop leanings of that single doesn't exactly make it the harbinger of Linkin Park gone full-blown pop that some thought it could be (myself included).  However, it isn't quite the "return to the roots" that's it's being marketed as either.

Yes, Chester's screaming more (most effectively on the raucous Lies Greed Misery).  Yes, Mike's rapping more.  But, any chest-thumping dumb jock looking for the downtuned chug-a-chug riffage of the first two albums is going to be sorely disappointed, since guitars are much more used for ambience than to propel songs here. 

Living Things isn't as soft or preachy as Minutes To Midnight or A Thousand Suns were (album closer and future single shoe-in Powerless is about as gentle as LP are willing to get this time), nor is it the raging inferno of Hybrid Theory or Meteora (yet it teases old schoolers masterfully with Victimized, a punk-infused shredder that's over in a slight 1:46).  It's a safe compromise for both band and fans; brimming with both brawn and beauty, never forcing itself uncomfortably into either camp.

At the end of the day, Living Things is not a safe return nor a bold departure.  It's a distillation of Linkin Park's strengths, a collection of ragged anthems polished and refined.  Moreover, it's the sound of a group that's stopped pretending to be something they're not.  Abandoning both wall-of-guitar bro-rock and gushy top 40 radio aspirations yields an album that's tight, consistently entertaining and never overbearing.

So, yes, all you fanboys and haters alike; Living Things is Linkin Park's best album yet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?