Skip to main content

Gallantly Streaming: City And Colour's Fleshed Out Fourth Album

Click here to go to iTunes and stream City And Colour's The Hurry And The Harm.

I've never been that big a fan of Dallas Green's solo work. It's not that I was that big a fan of Alexisonfire's work, but more a case of finding City And Colour's albums to be overly dull thanks to the predominance of acoustic guitars and slow tempos. Over the course of three albums, though, Green has been slowly introducing more (pun intended) colour to his musical palette. Whether it's the weeping slide backdropping the title track, the stabbing organ-punctuated groove of Thirst or the light strings on Two Coins, it's clear that C&C has added some new machinery in his music factory.

On The Hurry And The Harm, the listener still gets a good dose of the acoustic ballads that enamored longtime fans to City And Colour in the first place. However, there's a surprising level of variety spread across the disc's dozen tracks. Most tracks on this album benefit from complimentary instrumentation rather than the sparse arrangements that littered much of his earlier work. There may not be anything more immediately gripping than lead single Thirst; but it's all played and produced well, and the tempos don't dip too low too often. All in all, it's a pleasant listen that will sound best on a lonely night drive.

The Hurry And The Harm is out June 4 on Dine Alone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?