Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Pearl Jam - "Lightning Bolt"


It wouldn't have surprised anyone, myself included, if Pearl Jam had gone through the motions for the rest of their career; between three perfectly fine studio albums that nonetheless lacked in sense of adventure and staying power and the nostalgia trip that came with the band's twentieth anniversary, Pearl Jam haven't given all that much in the way of surprises in the last decade and change.

Lightning Bolt, their tenth album, is full of them.

The four years since Backspacer have provided ample time for the band to deliver this album, and though it hasn't been easy for fans to wait so long it's certainly beneficial to the record as a final product. Most satisfying is the adventurousness, which returns in spades; nearly every one of the dozen tracks sees them trying something they haven't before.

It's pointless to list all of the detours they take on Lightning Bolt; suffice to say, there are plenty of moments to make even the most seasoned fan say in disbelief, "this is Pearl Jam?" Let's just say you likely won't be accusing them of rehashing past hits very often and leave it at that.

What's perhaps more surprising is the cohesion of Lightning Bolt, considering its genre-hopping nature and the fact that it was basically recorded during two separate sessions two years apart. That they pull it all together to create a whole that makes sense of its parts is a testament to their professionalism.

I need to spend a lot more time with this record before passing final verdict, but as of this moment I'm inclined to heartily welcome back Pearl Jam and congratulate them on stretching their sound out at a time when it would have been far easier to fall back on past glories. But, then, they've never taken the easy way, have they?

October 15, 2013 • Monkeywrench/Republic
Highlights Mind Your Manners • Sirens • Pendulum

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?