Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Black Label Society - "Catacombs of the Black Vatican"


There's nothing wrong with sticking by a signature sound; if you think there are no dividends to be paid from stubbornly staying in place to avoid fan backlash, just ask AC/DC and Slayer what their take is on the subject. That said, Zakk Wylde's long standing main gig doesn't simply crank out carbon copies of the same album; Wylde's tastes are varied enough that Black Label Society has been able to offer up consistently entertaining studio efforts with minimal slippage save for, arguably, 2006's sort of weak Shot To Hell.

Perhaps a result of endless touring and releasing seven studio albums during a stretch of seven years, Shot To Hell sounded subdued and tired, and fans responded to it lukewarmly. Wisely, Wylde let his next album gestate, resulting in 2010's Order Of The Black; the four year wait seemed to do the trick, and the album was a thorough return to form.

Another four years have passed between that album and Catacombs Of The Black Vatican (not counting a couple of stopgap, mostly acoustic releases), and it's clear upon first listen that Wylde ddn't just throw a bunch of tunes together. However, what is noticeable is the lack of high tempos; this is as obvious a Black Sabbath nod as BLS has ever produced, and it's easily their most sluggish album to date. The album kicks off with three straight mid-tempo riff machines that aren't really much different from each other. Then, to shake things up, we get a well-done ballad (future single Angel Of Mercy) before the album finally picks up speed with Heart of Darkness. Sadly, this Stillborn-paced foot tapper and Children Of The Grave-paced Damn The Flood are the only two songs approaching speed on the album, the majority of the remainder alternating between medium paced dirge and lighters-up balladry (although, admittedly, closing track Shades of Grey just might be the best ballad Nazareth Black Label Society has ever done).

Catacombs Of The Black Vatican suffers from much of the same problem that last year's Alice In Chains release did; with the balance wrestled away from the rockers and tilting the album's favour toward the low-to-mid tempos, it can be a bit of a chore to listen to. And that's a shame, because Zakk Wylde's playing is in fine form on this album; of course you're getting a heaping helping of pinch harmonics, but I'm thoroughly impressed by his solo work this time out. His fingers can still navigate the fret board with blistering speed as he shows time and time again on this record's solos, which makes the hesitance to speed the actual songs up more often that much more puzzling.

In the end, you can't be angry about the album because it really isn't bad by any stretch, nor can you fault Wylde for playing to his strengths. Still, I can't help but be a little bit let down and a little tentative about BLS' future; after cranking out seven studio albums in the group's first seven years, there have only been two in the last eight, and I have to wonder if the desire is still there, especially if it takes four years to get a pretty good Black Label record when the last time it took four years we got a great one.

April 8, 2014 • Entertainment One
Highlights My Dying Time • Angel of Mercy • Damn the Flood

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?