Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Down - "Down IV (Part Two)"


A little before the release of the previous Down EP, I talked a bit about rationed albums, and discussed the potential reasoning behind it. What it almost always boils down to is money, and what it amounted to for fans of the bands I talked about in that article was paying up to triple value for a band's artistic vision because they chose to release it in staggered intervals rather than combining into one package. I mentioned Down in that article because they were employing an ambitious release strategy for their fourth album. Planned as a four part project, I couldn't help but wonder about the motivation; with so many bands (and their respective labels) looking to squeeze every last drop of milk from the udder before the industry goes tits up, shady practices were becoming increasingly common by the time part one of Down IV was released.

Given time to absorb it all, the prospect doesn't frighten me as much anymore; it hasn't become commonplace (although Pixies gave it their best shot) and, in Down's case particularly, the elapsed time between the release of the first two parts tells me it's more a service to their fans than a cash grab. Given their first album celebrates its twentieth anniversary next year, and the five years that separated Down III from Down IV Part One, think about how long we would have potentially had to wait if Down had decided to hold out until their double album was complete? If the final two parts are released at the same clip, we'd achieve completion in September 2017, or an entire decade after Down III's release. Certainly not our idea of fun, is it Tool fans?

So yes, we'll end up paying in the neighbourhood of $40 for a complete CD version of Down's fourth album, but I can live with that if it means not spending too much time waiting around for it. It also helps that what amounts to the first half of the double album has been worthy of waiting for; as Sabbathy sludge bands go, not many do it as well as Down, and Part Two sees them continue much down the same road as the first part, but a little meaner and more visceral. Take opener Steeple, which starts slow but explodes with a metallic burst and breaks into full gallop; think less N.I.B., more Children Of The Grave. This EP's single We Knew Him Well finds the grooves a little more guttural, Phil Anselmo seething, and it's a trend that carries on throughout.

The first trio of tracks concludes with Hogsheaddogshead, which is played well and sounds good but doesn't really go anywhere and made me a little concerned about filler. Thankfully, the latter half of the EP is where the best stuff is; the last three tracks bring it home in fine style, from the slow, menacing groove of Conjure through the thick and meaty Sufferer's Years to the sinister and squealing finale Bacchanalia (and its Zeppelin-esque, perhaps Part Three foreshadowing outro).

It's well worth it runtime-wise too; falling just shy of 37 minutes, it's longer than many artists' full albums, and sets Down IV up for a possible total time of over two hours. It should easily make for the most epic chapter in the band's discography and, if the quality of the first half is maintained, it could very well be their most enjoyable.

May 13, 2014 • Down Records/Warner Music
Highlights We Knew Him Well • Sufferer's Years • Bacchanalia

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?