1994 In Review: R.E.M.

1994 In Review: R.E.M. - "Monster"

In recent years, R.E.M.'s ninth album has undeservedly earned a somewhat tarnished reputation as a black sheep of their discography; in some circles Monster is regarded as a derivative grasp at "grunge", a crass deviation from their classic sound that reached into a cookie jar it had no business with. Is it derivative? Sure, a little; but, in the context of the band's career, Monster makes a lot of sense.

On their eight previous LPs, R.E.M. had already covered a lot of ground, from their beginnings as scrappy "college rock" vanguards to their mastery of the intelligent Americana from 1992's Automatic For The People (still hailed by a majority as not only their finest album but one of the all time greats). Following up such a substantial commercial and critical success was a game they couldn't possibly win; they were bound to face an undue amount of scrutiny no matter where they took their sound.

That they took it to such a comparatively loud place rubbed a lot of folks the wrong way. And, it's fine if you don't dig Monster, but at least credit R.E.M. for drawing up a play and seeing it through; those who heard lead single What's The Frequency, Kenneth? and assumed it to be an anomaly far removed from the album's representative sound were soon to discover that this was the rule rather than the exception. Nearly every nook and cranny is filled with raw energy and distortion; even some of the album's quietest moments, like the tender and affectionate Strange Currencies or the sultry I Don't Sleep, I Dream, course with buzzing guitars and/or squelching feedback.

Given its perception as Automatic For The People's brash and inferior follow-up, it often gets lost in the shuffle that this was the work of a band at their creative peak. As weird and shocking as it was upon release, What's The Frequency, Kenneth? remains one hell of a song. As distorted and jagged as it can be, Bang And Blame is still the result of top notch songwriting. Monster also contains Circus Envy which, if you'll allow a shred of favoritism, is my favourite R.E.M. song even to this day. It's about the least indicative song you could ever point to when describing what this band was, but damn if it doesn't hit my sweet spot on a purely visceral level.

R.E.M. could have responded to their biggest success by churning out more of the same, which would have definitely been safer and probably not nearly as exciting. Monster is the product of a band that was many things to many people over their three decades and change, but afraid was never one of them.

September 27, 1994 • Warner Bros.

Highlights What's the Frequency, Kenneth? • Strange Currencies • Circus Envy

Year in Rock 2025

Alright, I've got some explaining to do. By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but: a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?

SOUND BITES

Search This Blog