Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Smashing Pumpkins - "Monuments to an Elegy"


There aren't too many artists as restlessly, relentlessly artistic as Billy Corgan; even in Smashing Pumpkins' infancy, plenty of great songs ended up cast aside due to time and/or space restraints. Corgan's prolific tendencies were running at their peak in the mid-nineties; he recorded enough quality tunes during the Mellon Collie & the Infinite Sadness sessions to fill five CDs before paring it down to a manageable two.

A incredible run of songs such as that couldn't possibly be, and has never been, matched; even if we factor this newest album in as part of his ongoing Teargarden by Kaleidyscope series, we're only up to about 35 songs, and that's over the course of half a decade. Besides, few would accuse Corgan of continuing to offer the same quality as he was twenty years ago; to be fair, though, how could he? It's only natural for artists to evolve, and to move away from the perceived sweet spot of creativity that so many expect them to stay nuzzled in for all eternity.

That said, it's worth noting that Monuments to an Elegy (the Pumpkins' ninth album overall by default, and second in the Teargarden series behind a pair of EPs and 2012's Oceania) works beautifully as a standalone record. It's arguably Corgan's most cohesive and consistent batch of songs since Siamese Dream, if not ever; then again, with a mere nine songs and under 33 minutes run time, it's also the Pumpkins' shortest record by 13 minutes (making debut album Gish runner-up).

Such a compact presentation isn't what we're used to from Corgan, and yet here we have it: a quick, painless Pumpkins record that doesn't indulge itself in too many sonic detours, coming and going in easily digestible four minute chunks. In a way, it acts as the ideal entry point for would-be new fans and re-entry for old fans who have strayed over the years; it's as low risk a sample of what Smashing Pumpkins is as you could ask for, free of most of the clutter and bombast that have (by times clumsily) marked the majority of Corgan's output for two decades now.

The most refreshing aspect of Monuments to an Elegy is that, rather than go off on wild tangents or take away from anyone's idea of what a Pumpkins album is supposed to sound like, it's all right there on the surface; nine pretty damn good synth-pop songs with enough of Corgan's trademark guitar muscle to let you know who's responsible. Some are above average (especially Drum + Fife and One and All), some come ever so close but miss the mark slightly (Run2me, Dorian), most hit the middle ground between "meh" and "wow". The album also houses perhaps Corgan's most unashamed pop song in fifteen years in closer Anti-Hero, a crunchy ditty with a bubblegum centre that could have positively smashed as the lead single on Machina.

Overall, Monuments to an Elegy won't take people back to the "glory days" of Mellon Collie or make them forget Zeitgeist exists, so as to say it isn't Corgan's grandest statement or greatest blunder; it's simply a good, straight ahead record with minimal missteps that none but the harshest cynics could find too much fault in. I suspect that, for a lot of fans, that's vindication enough for a career that's been ruthlessly criticized for the better part of the last decade.

December 9, 2014 • Martha's Music
Highlights Drum + Fife • One and All • Anti-Hero

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?