Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Metallica - "Hardwired... To Self-Destruct"


As a standalone album, the tenth by metal titans Metallica ticks all the boxes. Like the thrash-centric assault they built their empire on? Check. Like the groove-laden riffs that helped them conquer the world a quarter century ago? Check. Don't feel like it's really a Metallica album without a nagging issue or two? Check and check.

The good news is, Metallica haven't sounded quite so engaged in what they're creating in some time. This is certainly an album crafted with the songs and the overall listening experience in mind. As for the songs, there's very little filler (although Murder One, an heartfelt tribute to fallen star Lemmy, reeks a bit of cheese despite best intentions); there's also a conscious effort to sneak away from the forced back-to-basics vibe of Death Magnetic, which resulted in some pretty good songs but, overall, struck me as at least a partial act of pandering. This time out, only about a quarter of the album thrashes, while the majority manages to stay heavy while cutting down the tempos. Think Load, but with more muscle. Or, the "black album" with less radio friendliness. Or, Death Magnetic with more radio friendliness. It offers something for Metallica fans no matter what their favourite Metallica album is (unless that album is St. Anger, which of course it isn't).

What brings Hardwired... To Self-Destruct down a peg is the same problem that's plagued Metallica for the better part of twenty years now; the editor is asleep in the cutting room. Songs that have no business being seven or eight minutes long are, because, well... maybe Metallica thinks they just have to be? The long intros and outros that built their songs up and brought them to cathartic conclusions back in the '80s are just here to pad out the run times now. The one exception is the fleeting title track, and I think other songs would have benefited from a similarly streamlined approach; 9 of 12 tracks are 6½ minutes or longer and, while they're not bad songs, they likely would have been better served in the 5-5½ minute range. There's a difference between epic and bloated, and we're shown it here.

Also, I'm curious as to why Metallica chose to release this as a double CD when the total length is under 78 minutes, or about two minutes shorter than Load. Perhaps it's simply a case of Metallica wanting Hardwired to feel bigger and more important than it is. Double albums feel more like events, and it's clear judging from the way they rolled out this record's campaign that event status is something they were looking for. It's just kind of a shame, though, because Hardwired didn't need to be stretched out and trumped up to such an extent. It's the best batch of songs Metallica have delivered in a long time, an album capable of exceeding listener expectations; and, while it did exceed mine, I can't help but think a more concise execution (and probably a better album cover) could have helped this record hold its own against the band's best work.

November 18, 2016 • Blackened
Highlights Atlas, Rise! • Dream No More • Spit Out the Bone

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2013 Nominee: Arctic Monkeys

ARCTIC MONKEYS Do I Wanna Know? From: AM Released: September 10 That Year in Rock 2012's Single of the Year R U Mine? ended up on this album is pleasing, and it fits the motif well enough. But R U Mine? isn't what makes Arctic Monkeys' fifth album an Album of the Year contender. Sweaty, sultry and pulsing with sexual energy, AM is the kind of record that's just as effective whether you're chilling out after a long day, staring into a mirror prepping yourself for a late night clubbing session or setting the mood for some escapades in the boudoir.

Year in Rock 2023: Album of the Year #10-1

Now we're getting somewhere; the top ten, where there are no duds or mids, only bangers. Also, no more teasing it out; let's wrap this up!  What I've learned this year from my ten faves this year is that it is indeed still possible for a dude approaching his fifties to more or less stay up to date on the new school. Of course, there are some listed here that got a boost from playing tribute to the old school, but there is an undercurrent happening in rock that points to the future. But, I'm getting ahead of myself; here come the champs. 10 MILITARIE GUN Life Under the Gun June 23, 2023 • Loma Vista Highlights Very High Will Logic Never Fucked Up Once Rising from the ranks of the still-potent L.A. hardcore scene, the debut record from Militarie Gun (following a trio of EPs) bears a dash of polish that's expected with backing from a larger label; the tension and energy remain, though, resulting in one of the catchiest hardcore albums I can think of in recent years. 9 ...