Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Dead Cross - S/T


As the project that reunites multi-faceted vocalist Mike Patton with his former Fantomas band mate Dave Lombardo, Dead Cross was already enticing before a note was played. Throw in Justin Pearson and Michael Crain of renowned hardcore punk group Retox, and the possibilities become endless.

To no one's surprise, Patton is in fine form here, and those used to his more extreme tendencies (such as on Fantomas and Mr. Bungle records) will be pleased to hear that Patton is still just as effective and entrancing when he spitting, shrieking and snarling as he is when he's singing. His manic deliveries are especially welcome considering the relative restraint shown on his last two high-profile records (Faith No More's Sol Invictus and Tomahawk's Oddfellows); any concerns that age has lessened Patton's abilities are put to rest early and often.

Lombardo's drumming prowess is also no secret to anyone who's been paying attention, and his performance here is reliably pummeling. Meanwhile, Pearson and Crain are relegated to "along for the ride" status almost by default; it's not that they're not playing to their abilities, it's just that when you're comparing your abilities to those of perhaps the greatest vocalist and drummer of an entire generation, you're in pretty tough.

Overall, Dead Cross' debut record offers brutality and precision in spades (oh, and a cover of Bauhaus' Bela Lugosi's Dead for extra cool points), and hearing Patton pushing his madcap pipes to their limits for the first time in years is a thrill in and of itself. The songs aren't exactly new standards in hardcore, but anyone who's admired the members of the band aren't likely to be disappointed; it's a small investment of time at under a half hour, but the amount of blood and guts provided proves this to be an album of undeniable value.

August 4, 2017 • Ipecac
Highlights Idiopathic • Obedience School • Grave Slave

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?
1 comment
Read more