Skip to main content

Year in Rock 2012 Nominee: ...And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead

...AND YOU WILL KNOW US BY THE TRAIL OF DEAD
Catatonic
From: Lost Songs
Released: October 23

...And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead sometimes don't take it easy on their fans. Those of us who have stuck through them over the years have had to endure lots of ups and downs, and the music took a noted downturn in quality as the band grew more and more dissatisfied with their record label. Lost Songs marks the third album released on their own label, and it forgoes the tentative steps away from overblown prog-infused noise rock that marked The Century Of Self, and also puts the more explicitly melodic tendencies that actually somewhat worked to their advantage on Tao Of The Dead. Instead, Lost Songs brings the noise pillar to post, urgently and consistently. It's lazy to compare it to their now decade-old critically revered masterpiece Source Tags And Codes, and that's also unfair to Lost Songs. The album very well may be Trail Of Dead's first album in 10 years to absolutely thrill instead of merely exciting, but it's an album better not put side by side with a 21st century classic and instead put in the context of the four albums that came before; in this chronology, us fans can feel even better about Lost Songs, because it shows a band that hasn't come full circle but rather went through hell to find themselves again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?