Skip to main content

1994 In Review: Alice In Chains - "Jar of Flies"


Upon its original release twenty years ago today, there wasn't a lot of hoopla surrounding Alice in Chains' second EP. A tidy seven song package designed to hold over fans eagerly anticipating a follow-up to their breakthrough sophomore album Dirt, Alice in Chains' Jar of Flies certainly didn't feel like a major event. Thought of as a sombre addendum to Dirt and a baby brother to Sap (the 1992 EP that preceded Dirt), it didn't strike anyone as more than a place for lighter and/or weaker material.

We couldn't be blamed for lowered expectations; Sap, while home to a few worthy tracks, didn't take itself too seriously and didn't leave much of a lasting impression. However, Jar of Flies was soon discovered to be no mere stopgap release. The playing, acoustically leaning is it was, had the same weight as Dirt's best moments; it's apparent from the opening seconds of Rotten Apple that real care was taken to give these songs not just a chance to exist, but to thrive in the environment. 

The real shock in listening to Jar of Flies, even twenty years later, is that every song deserves to be there. Silly distractions are kept to a minimum; unlike Sap, where any sense of earnestness is deflated by embarrassing hidden track Love Song, and even Dirt, a very serious album that couldn't help but riff comically on Iron Man. Even its loosest moments have meaning; closer Swing On This could have easily degenerated into the same schlock and awe as Love Song, but pulls itself together with its nice, hefty choruses.

It's difficult to pick a highlight, but for me it's practically a five-way tie between everything aside from Whale And Wasp (a capably performed instrumental that nonetheless smacks just a little of filler) and Swing On This. The other five all have merit and, depending on your mood, pack quite the punch. There's tremendous heart and guts on display, and lifting some of the crunch from their trademark sound reveals a band whose emotions were best served raw.

Alice in Chains would go on to release one more album with Layne Staley as principal vocalist before drugs started to take the ultimate toll on the revered singer. 1995's self titled album was (in this guy's opinion) a triumph, but even there you can tell the difference a year and change on drugs can make. Often meandering, sometimes bewildering, it's more suitable as a case study than a record. So, in many ways, Jar of Flies was the last time we heard Staley's true voice, the one still fighting his demons rather than being defeated by them. In this context, haunting ballad Don't Follow feels much more haunted than even Alice in Chains closer Over Now. It's a beautiful, sad, heartbreaking track that (correctly) predicts a bleak future for its narrator.

It's true that Alice in Chains would soldier on, eventually recruiting William Duvall and making new music. But (as far as Layne is concerned) Jar of Flies feels like the band's most poignant statement, especially given what the coming years were to bring. If Dirt was the acknowledgment of the problem and the self titled album was admission of defeat, Jar of Flies spoke to the uncertainty of it all that most of us can relate to (albeit on a smaller scale). It surprised twenty years ago, and it still resonates today.

January 25, 1994 • Columbia
Highlights Nutshell • I Stay Away • Don't Follow

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2013 Nominee: Arctic Monkeys

ARCTIC MONKEYS Do I Wanna Know? From: AM Released: September 10 That Year in Rock 2012's Single of the Year R U Mine? ended up on this album is pleasing, and it fits the motif well enough. But R U Mine? isn't what makes Arctic Monkeys' fifth album an Album of the Year contender. Sweaty, sultry and pulsing with sexual energy, AM is the kind of record that's just as effective whether you're chilling out after a long day, staring into a mirror prepping yourself for a late night clubbing session or setting the mood for some escapades in the boudoir.

Year in Rock 2023: Album of the Year #10-1

Now we're getting somewhere; the top ten, where there are no duds or mids, only bangers. Also, no more teasing it out; let's wrap this up!  What I've learned this year from my ten faves this year is that it is indeed still possible for a dude approaching his fifties to more or less stay up to date on the new school. Of course, there are some listed here that got a boost from playing tribute to the old school, but there is an undercurrent happening in rock that points to the future. But, I'm getting ahead of myself; here come the champs. 10 MILITARIE GUN Life Under the Gun June 23, 2023 • Loma Vista Highlights Very High Will Logic Never Fucked Up Once Rising from the ranks of the still-potent L.A. hardcore scene, the debut record from Militarie Gun (following a trio of EPs) bears a dash of polish that's expected with backing from a larger label; the tension and energy remain, though, resulting in one of the catchiest hardcore albums I can think of in recent years. 9 ...