Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Incubus - "8"


I was looking forward to an Incubus album for the first time in over a decade. After the blatantly star-reaching Light Grenades, the lifeless If Not Now, When? and the tentative EP Trust Fall, a pair of singles had me cautiously optimistic for 8, Incubus' first full-length in about six years. Nimble Bastard and Glitterbomb were energetic, vibrant singles and, while they posed no threat to the band's artistic peak, I was at least assured that they intended on following through on Trust Fall's momentum.

A funny thing happened on the way to this album's release, though; as the story goes, Skrillex was brought to the studio while Incubus was well into the sessions for 8, and proceeded to try his hand at mixing one of the tunes. The band liked what they heard, and subsequently commissioned mixes for the songs they'd already completed. This included Nimble Bastard (which had already been serviced to radio and streaming), the song that got me excited for the record in the first place.

Because of this, the version of the song that appears here is far different than advertised; its drums and vocals are much louder, there are effects piled on top, and it's generally a far more obnoxious sounding track compared to its original presentation. The entire record is just as jarring, kick drums and vocals burying everything else, all oppressively loud and disorienting; I can't even really judge this thing on its songs since I spent the majority of my listening cringing at how awful it all sounds; it's borderline criminal, because I get the sense this album could be a real return to form, but I can't be sure since I made the grave mistake of actually buying the CD instead of playing it as background music through a shitty cell phone speaker, which seems to be the market this mix is going for.

Yep, I'm shaking my cane from the porch again here, but I still can't fathom why decisions are made to present music in a way that caters to streamers and does a great disservice to the band and label's direct paying customers. This is an especially grievous offence in Incubus' case since I know more suitable-for-CD mixes existed for at least some of these tracks just months ago. I feel cheated here, lured in with a good song that turned into hot garbage once I made the decision to fork over my $15. There may not be many of us left who actually care about how music sounds, but it seems to me that we deserve a hell of a lot better than a complete disregard for dynamics and squandered promises.

Is the music better than last time? Sure, I suppose so. Maybe the next time I press play and go to the other end of the house to do something other than intentionally listen to music, I might even like it. That does Incubus no good in the here and now, when I'm typing this out and having my ears assaulted by this infuriating shit sandwich of a mix. As it stands, 8 is the rock album equivalent of going to a restaurant and ordering a decent steak, and being charged for a steak, but being served a cheeseburger because most people are fine with cheeseburgers. I'm not fine with it; Incubus, you owe me a fucking steak.

April 21, 2017 • Island
Highlights No Fun • Glitterbomb • Love in a Time of Surveillance

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?