Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Queens of the Stone Age - "Songs for the Deaf"

Reminds Me Of:
Other Queens releases to date, except cranked to 11 and spawned in the same greasy fryer as old-school Motorhead, Priest, etc.

High On:
* The Queens' transition from pure stoner rock to loud, obnoxious, skilled riffage and deadly rhythm section
* Dave Grohl... he absolutely pounds the hell out of the drums, giving the album even more of an arena sound
* Josh Homme's songwriting: less repetative, more insightful
* The pure diversity of the album, from metalized punk ("Millionaire") to bouncy thrash rawk ("No One Knows") to ambitious grunge ("Sky Is Fallin") to playful, obscenity-laced garage metal ("Six Shooter") to Chili Peppers meet The Doors on crack ("Hangin Tree") to tripped-out blues ("God Is In The Radio") to 60's romance shlock ("Another Love Song")... you get the idea, I'm sure.
* The album's concept: A journey through a number of radio stations during a drive from Los Angeles to the desert, featuring a variety of formats and wide array of on-air talent (strangely enough, every station seems to be playing QOTSA).
* The wink-and-grin inclusion of a sort of reprise to "Feel Good Hit Of The Summer" (from 2000's 'Rated R'), with laughter replacing lyrics.
* The quiet calm of "Mosquito Song", a thoughtful accordion-laced ballad that probably wouldn't have been a hidden track on anyone else's album.

Low On:
* I seriously can't think of anything, besides the rather hideously plain album cover.

The Bottom Line:
QOTSA have officially arrived with 'Songs For The Deaf', and whether you're baked out of your mind on every drug you can find, or sober as a judge on a Monday morning, you cannot and will not ignore them.

9 EXCELLENT
August 27, 2002 • Interscope
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?
1 comment
Read more