Skip to main content

Year in Rock 2011 Nominee: Butch Walker

BUTCH WALKER
Summer of  '89

From: The Spade
Released: August 30

It has to be a little frustrating being Butch Walker.  He's spent such a huge chunk of his career co-writing with and/or producing other artists' albums and watching them achieve massive success (see Avril Lavigne, Katy Perry, Pink, Simple Plan, Weezer, many others), while people have largely ignored his own artistic output.  Walker's former band Marvelous3 was a minor blip on the radar way back in 1999 with the song Freak of the Week, but since then he's had struggles holding the attention of listeners (myself included) through a string of increasingly adult contemporary-oriented solo albums.  That's why it was such a shock to hear Summer of '89, a loud and raucous track that, while certainly sporting a pronounced pop sheen in its production, hearkens back to the wild and reckless arena-sized noise that Marvelous3 stopped making about ten years ago.

As it turns out, the majority of The Spade, while slick and bright in overall production, has its heart in the classic rock and pop that Walker grew up with; think Ziggy Stardust meets Slippery When Wet.  There's a lot of nostalgia at work in the album's lyrics, and that's no coincidence; Walker also published a memoir this year that serves as pretty much the most detailed liner notes any album could ask for.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?