Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: AFI - "AFI (The Blood Album)"


If it feels like AFI are hardened veterans at this point, it's because that's absolutely true; it's easy to forget that Sing the Sorrow, their 2003 breakthrough, was actually their sixth record (this one marks album #10). It's also easy to forget that the band encountered some pretty fierce backlash to Sing the Sorrow from fairweather fans bemoaning the shift from more standard punk fare that occurred over the course of those first five records. That fickle criticism follows them to this day, and at this point it feels like silly, petty shit talk. Consider The Blood Album, the culmination of over two decades of maturation and an album that has echoes of all of AFI's past lives while continuing to offer new ideas.

Even fans of their emo/goth commercial zenith may be surprised at the growth here, especially if they hadn't been paying attention during AFI's last couple of album cycles. Often lumped in with all of those eyeliner-and-razors emo upstarts that captivated the minds of angry teens in the aughts (perhaps ever so slightly unfairly), the band shed much of that aesthetic years ago. There are a few moments of typical angsty emo fare here, sure (Hidden Knives most blatantly nostalgic for that period), but the majority of The Blood Album finds AFI sonically more or less where they should be ten albums in; confident enough to revisit their past without outright aping it, while edging their sound toward a more nuanced, less dated position. It's a consistent (if two or three tracks too long) album by a band that has grown up with their fans, and those who've stayed around this long shouldn't be disappointed in the least.

January 20, 2017 • Concord
Highlights Still a Stranger • Get Hurt • Snow Cats

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?
1 comment
Read more