Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Code Orange - "Forever"


In the world of heavy music, bands aren't usually encouraged to stretch the parameters of their core sound; whichever subgenre you come in on is the one you're expected to stay on. So for Code Orange, with their background in punk and hardcore, Forever is a risky project; at its foundation, it's very much a hardcore record, but there are flourishes of outside influence to be heard as well. Industrial, mathcore, nu-metal, and even dashes of shoegaze and melodic alt-rock are added as spice.

Still, the common thread is the bloody sinew of bone-crushing guitars and pummeling drums. It's what keeps Forever consistent, and helps any deviations from the script at least seem not so deviant in the context of all the chaos. This is also a record that keeps a tentative distance from clichés of the genre and, though there are certainly a fair share of prototypical breakdowns, the songs as a whole are approached with as much a sense of discovery as one of reverence.

At the end of the day, though, all you're likely to care about is whether or not Code Orange's concoction can kick your ass. Rest assured, it's capable of devastation; that it may expand your horizons along the way is an added bonus.

January 13, 2017 • Roadrunner
Highlights Forever • Kill the Creator • Bleeding in the Blur

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?