Skip to main content

IN REVIEW: Frank Carter & The Rattlesnakes - "Modern Ruin"

After a debut album with The Rattlesnakes that saw Frank Carter channel some of the fiery rage that he expressed during his formative years with Gallows, its follow-up sees a slight return to the more measured, less incendiary music that he explored after leaving Gallows and forming Pure Love. That's not to say that we're in for Pure Love II here, as arrangements here aren't as blatantly geared toward airplay; instead, they retain some of the bite of previous record Blossom while placing more focus on the songcraft than the aesthetic. There are layers and flow here as well as personal chaos; the difference here is that it's controlled chaos.

There will be some detractors in the "longtime fan" camp who will lament the loss of edge, but Modern Ruin is not a soft record; its A-side houses most of the obvious single choices, while the B-side packs a bit more of a wallop, especially on the album's title track (which should alone dispel the notion that Frank can't do loud and angry anymore). As it happens, Carter has grown as a lyricist and a songwriter; the album's closing track, the tender (for its first half at least) ballad Neon Rust, has tiny echoes of Radiohead and arena-mode Green Day. The thing is, it's an assured and powerful closer, and really brings the album into focus; a record full of thrashing and spitting ragers wouldn't have had the first clue what to do with a song like this, but it fits here beautifully.

Whether Carter's intensity level meets your standards or not is irrelevant on Modern Ruin; simply put, this is an album that acts as a showcase for growth. It proves that Frank Carter is capable of both seething and soothing, and has developed a formidable knack for knowing when to do which.

8 GREAT
January 20, 2016 • International Death Cult
Highlights Lullaby • Modern Ruin • Neon Rust

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?