Skip to main content

Year in Rock 2011 Nominee: Fair to Midland

FAIR TO MIDLAND
Whiskey & Ritalin

From: Arrows & Anchors
Released: July 12

Fair to Midland are one of those bands you rarely read about in magazines or online, but there's a groundswell of extremely vocal fans screaming out adulation at the top of their lungs, proclaiming the band as the best thing to ever happen anywhere while most of the world ignores them.  After giving in to curiosity and checking out their latest album Arrows & Anchors, I can see where both sides are coming from.  The band is filling the void left by System of a Down, whose fans have always been rabid supporters, so it makes sense that Fair to Midland would generate a certain level of fanaticism (although, to be fair, they were once signed to Serj Tankian's record label).  Which is not to compare the bands on a heaviness scale (because System leaves FtM's feet danging four feet off the ground on that seesaw), but rather they're creating world-minded, sonically diverse music that happens to be (mostly) aggressive in nature.  However, where System of a Down were absolute masters of straddling the fine line between eccentric and just plain odd, Fair to Midland haven't quite moved past looking at the line from the odd side and wondering what it all means.  They're getting closer, though, and a handful of tracks on Arrows & Anchors evoke that same kind of "Yeah! You take that world by the hair and drag it back to your cave" primal euphoria that I'm sure their staunchest fans feel during every note.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Year in Rock 2025

  Alright, I've got some explaining to do.   By now anyone who's visited this blog is well aware of how infrequently I've used this space in recent years; aside from the occasional fertile year of content, I really haven't posted all that often over the last five years or so. There are many reasons for this, which have already been outlined in previous apology posts; but, essentially, it boils down to my own laziness and the cold reality that blogs are, like Refused (again), fucking dead. So, I wouldn't hold my breath for a triumphant return to reviews, or even semi-regular posts, but:   a) I feel like Year in Rock posts have always belonged here and, even though I've experimented with different methods of presentation recently and been satisfied, the "blink and you missed it" unveiling via Facebook stories this year was perhaps ultimately a disservice to the records I lauded. After all, cramming the list into short videos isn't too far off from ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Year in Rock 2014: And the Winners Are...

It's been a long year, and another great one for rock n' roll. While the pop charts were overrun with barely legals obsessed with their asses, rock soldiered on undeterred even as pundits (hell, in some cases even rockers themselves) mourned the genre. Sure, rock didn't dominate the money game in 2014, but that shouldn't evoke sad nostalgia and eulogies. Even for as little perceived impact rock music made, a hell of a lot happened if people had only paid attention. From grizzled vets adding jewels to their crown (Springsteen, Petty) to new beginnings (Against Me!, Antemasque) to happy returns (Faith No More, The Tea Party) and all points in between, rock continued to thrive, evolve and thrill in 2014. Enough talk. It's winning time. Your Year in Rock winners for 2014 are...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hear Me Out: Why Do A Greatest Hits Album?

So, Silversun Pickups announced a "singles collection" today. Now, I'm no expert on "singles" or "hits" compilations; even so, I've got to say this announcement threw me for a loop for a couple of reasons. For starters, isn't it a bit early for a band like Silversun Pickups to be given the "greatest hits" treatment? I know, I know, it's a "singles collection". But, come on; it looks like a greatest hits album, it smells like a greatest hits album, so on so forth. More importantly, though, are these really necessary entities in 2014? I mean, who is this album for? Casual fans who've already downloaded the singles they like or established fans who are expected to shill out $15 for one new song?
1 comment
Read more